In vitro and In silico approach in Evaluating the Immunomodulatory potential of Ethanol extract of Sinapis alba Linn. seed.
Deventhiran M1, John Wyson W2, Sheik Noor Mohamed M3*
1Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology,
Apollo Arts and Science College, Sendrambakkam, Madhavaram, Chennai – 600052, Tamil Nadu.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Food Processing Technology,
AMET University, Chennai - 603112, Tamil Nadu.
3Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Biology and Plant Biotechnology,
The New College, Chennai – 600014, Tamil Nadu.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: msheiknoormohamed@thenewcollege.edu.in
ABSTRACT:
Sinapis alba Linn., one of the traditionally used medicinal plant was analyzed for the immunomodulatory potential using in vitro and in silico approach. In vitro immunomodulatory analysis of S. alba ethanol seed extract was evaluated using NO (Nitric Oxide) and phagocytic assay determination assay with Raw 264.7, macrophage cell line. Result showed that there was a significant induction in NO production with 40.18% at 12.5μg/ml and maximum phagocytic stimulation of 83.08% at 12.50μg/ml. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry analysis of ethanol seed extract of S. alba showed presence of 13 phytocomponents. Ligands were prepared from these 13 components. Compounds passing in-silico drug-likeness were subjected to molecular docking analysis with target protein 4NKQ (Macrophage colony stimulating factor protein). Among the 13 phytocomponents, Ethyl 13-docosenoate (ethyl erucate) bound with high docking score of 142.43 at the active site 2 with five hydrogen bonds. The findings thus suggest that S. alba possess immunomodulatory potential and the compound Ethyl 13-docosenoate (ethyl erucate) could be further investigated for incorporation in pharmaceutical applications.
KEYWORDS: Sinapis alba Linn., In silico, Immunomodulatory, Molecular docking, Phytoconstituents, ADME, etc.
INTRODUCTION:
Immune system is the most valuable defense system that protects its host from different kinds of antigens1. Immune response can either be stimulated or suppressed based on the requirement. Substance that can modify the nature of immune response are known commonly as immunomodulators2.
In recent days, even modern drugs are manufactured by using indigenous plant resources as raw material enriching our traditional herbal based therapy3, thus development of immunomodulatory drugs from natural compounds has attracted considerable interest.
Many researchers have reported that medicinal plant being the source for exhibiting a number of therapeutic activities, is also found to possess immunomodulatory properties that can control the outcome of certain immune responses4. Plant derived phytoconstituents including certain Alkaloids, flavonoids, lectin, glycoproteins, polysaccharides, sterols, and sterolins can be used as immunomodulators5. S. alba, commonly called as white mustard belongs to the family Brassicaceae is reported to possess cure to various ailments in folklore medicines6. S. alba is used in the ayurvedic system of medicine to treat migraine, cholera, cough, whooping cough, cold, flu, swollen joints and it is also used as an appetizer7. Despite extensive review on previous literature and keeping in view the immense importance of the members of family Brassicaceae, there is only a few scientific data available on immunomodulation study of this plant. Hence it is necessary to validate the safe and traditional use of this plant to find out new potential natural immunomodulators.
In recent years, in silico analysis has emerged as a powerful tool in the study of immunomodulatory properties of medicinal plant extracts. The computational approach leverages advanced techniques such as ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion) and molecular docking predictions to predict and analyze the interactions between bioactive compounds and immune system components. By simulating these interactions, researchers can identify potential immunomodulatory compounds, understand their mechanisms of action, and predict their efficacy and safety profiles. Since the integration of in vitro methods with in silico approaches offers a comprehensive framework for the discovery of novel immunomodulatory agents from medicinal plants. This study aims to synergize these two techniques to explore the immunomodulatory activity of ethanol seed extract of S. alba.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Collection of plant material:
The seeds of S. alba were procured during the month of April, 2014, from Herbal medicine market in Chennai city, Tamil Nadu, India. The seeds were authenticated in the Department of Medicinal Botany, National institute of Siddha, Chennai and a voucher specimen [voucher number - NISMB2052015] was submitted.
Preparation of extract:
Plant seeds were washed using distilled water thoroughly to avoid any external remains and shade dried at room temperature for a week. Dried seeds were ground to fine powder using a blender. 30gram of powdered sample was extracted with 300ml of ethanol solvent at 78oC for 9hours8. The extract was concentrated using rotary evaporator at reduced pressure. Obtained seed extract was filtered and stored at 4°C for further use.
Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrum analysis:
The composition of the ethanol extract of S. alba seed was established by GC-MS analysis. The analysis was performed on a JEOL GCMATE II GC-MS system in EI/CI mode equipped with a split/split less injector (220°C), at a split ratio of 1/10, using a VF-1MS fused-silica capillary column (30m × 0.25mm i.d.; film thickness: 0.25mm). The oven temperature was programmed from 60°C (5min) to 280°C at a rate of 4C/min and held at the temperature for 10min. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 0.8ml/min. Mass spectra were taken at 70 eV; a scan interval of 0.5 s and fragments from 40 to 550 Da. The spectrums of the components were compared with the database of known spectrum components stored in the NIST library9.
Cell culture:
Raw 264.7, a murine macrophage cell line obtained from National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS; Job no.-2121), Pune, India, was maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2mM L-glutamine, 100μg⁄ml penicillin and 100μg⁄ml streptomycin in a humidified incubator, at 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere. For the treatment with cell, seed extract was adjusted to the initial concentration and serially diluted with DMEM to the desired concentrations (100μg/ml, 50μg/ml, 25μg/ml, 12.5μg/ml, 6.25μg/ml, 3.12μg/ml and 1.56μg/ml).
In vitro Nitric Oxide assay:
The presence of Nitric oxide was determined in cell culture media using Griess reagent10. Raw 264.7 Cells were seeded (1x106 cells/ml) to flat bottom 96-well microtiter plates (100μl/well). Medium alone and the medium containing various concentrations of ethanol extract of the seeds (100μl/well) were added to each well. After 24hr of incubation, 100μl of culture supernatants were collected in a separate 96 well plates without any merge. Equal volume i.e., 100μl of Griess reagent was mixed with culture supernatants and incubated at room temperature for 10min. The absorbance values were measured at 540nm using a microplate reader. The amount of nitric oxide released was then quantified.
In vitro phagocytic assay:
a) Preparation of Candida albicans suspension:
Candida albicans procured from King Institute of Preventive Medicine and Research, Guindy, Chennai was maintained on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar medium in the form of slant culture. C. albicans of density 5x107 cells/ml adjusted using DMEM was used as the test microorganism in the bioassay.
b) Nitro Blue Tetrazolium (NBT) assay:
Macrophages cell lines Raw 264.7 was used for the assay. 20μl of cell suspension with 1x106 cells/ml concentration along with 40μl of DMEM was seeded to flat bottom 96-well cell culture plate. 20μl of the seed extracts prepared in concentrations of 100μg/ml, 50 μg/ml, 25μg/ml, 12.5μg/ml, 6.25μg/ml, 3.12μg/ml and 1.56μg/ml was added to each well and incubated for 24h in 5% CO2 at 37°C. then 20μl of yeast cell suspension (5×107 particles/ml) and 20μl of NBT were added to the wells containing Raw 264.7 cells and incubated at the same condition. After 1h of incubation DMEM was used to rinse the adherent macrophages and washed with 200μl methanol for four times. Culture plates was left to dry. 120μl of 2M Potassium hydroxide and 140μl of Dimethyl sulfoxide were added to the dried culture plates and the absorbance was measured at 540nm using microplate reader11. Stimulation index (SI) was calculated the ratio of the treated well and control well absorbence.
In silico analyses:
a) Ligand preparation:
The 3D chemical structures of components identified in the seed extracts of plants were retrieved through the PubChem compound database at NCBI (The National Center for Biotechnology Information). SDF format of these compounds were used as ligands.
b) Druglikness and ADMET properties of ligands:
Drug like and non-drug like properties of any natural or artificial molecules can be distinguished with the help of Lipinski's rule of 5. Molecules that comply with 2 or more of the following rules could be predicted to possess drug likeness properties. ADME analysis includes the molecular properties of ligands for absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) for drug prediction12.
c) Target protein preparation:
The structure of target protein Macrophage colony stimulating factor protein was retrieved from Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB) with PDB ID: 4NKQ serves as docking receptor. Water molecules bound to the ligands were removed from the active site of the protein receptor13.
d) Molecular docking:
Selected ligands that qualify ADME and Druglikness were filtered and used for the molecular docking analysis. Docking was performed using Accelry's Discovery studio 4.014 ligand fit protocols by applying appropriate force field on the target and the drugs. Ligand with highest dock score that binds to the active binding site of the target protein was selected and finally the amino acid residues to which the ligand binds was revealed. The docking scores, internal energy of ligands, and potential mean force (PMF) values are estimated. Root-mean-square distance (RMSD) between the docked structure and the original conformation of the inhibitor in each complex was calculated.
e) Statistical analysis:
The results were expressed as mean±standard deviation. The effects of treatments were determined by analyzing the data using one-way ANOVA using the Graph Pad Prism 6.0 software package. P values <0.05 or <0.001 were considered as statistically significant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Medicinal plants as immunomodulator are an effective alternate to conventional chemotherapy for a number of ailments15. Medicinally valuable plant namely S. alba was assessed for immunomodulatory efficacy. Nitric oxide production by macrophage cell Raw 264.7 assessed using Griess assay showed that ethanol seed extract had potential modulatory effect on NO production in vitro compared to basal control. Elevated production of NO was recorded with 40.18% at 12.5 μg/ml though the rate of NO production declined at doses above and below 12.5μg/ml in Raw 264.7 cells. NO production in Raw 264.7 was shown in figure 1 and table 1.
Production of NO by macrophages is a proinflammatory response to eradicate invading microorganisms. The principal effector molecule Nitric oxide produced in macrophages can be used as a quantitative index to evaluate macrophage activation16,17. Substances that modify the activity of NO may possess considerable therapeutic value18. In the present study, ethanol extract of S. alba assessed for the potential ability to modulate NO production by macrophages. The seed extracts were observed to induce and inhibit NO production at the appropriate concentration. Similar to current investigation, many plant extracts have been reported to modulate NO production by murine macrophages19,20,21,22. NO production in the immune system acts as a major cytotoxic mediator and plays a vital role in eliminating the invading microorganisms and tumor cells. However, production of excessive NO has been associated with a range of inflammatory diseases including arteriosclerosis, ischemic reperfusion, hypertension and septic shock23,24. Since NO is a multifunctional cell signaling molecule, the compounds that has impact on its production could also affect the signaling pathways in many related cell types25. Nevertheless, such findings have tremendous therapeutic applications for neural degenerative diseases26, inflammatory diseases27 and many more, where macrophages are responsible for aggravating the medical conditions.
Figure 1: Effect of Sinapis alba seed extracts on NO production by Raw 264.7 macrophage cells.
Data represent the mean ± S.D. of independent experiments performed in triplicates (n=3).
Statistical significance is indicated as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison tests.
**P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.
Table 1: Percentage of NO production by Raw 264.7 cells treated with S. alba seed extract.
|
S. No. |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Percentage of No production |
|
1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. |
100 50 25 12.5 6.25 3.12 1.56 |
4.67 11.21 13.08 40.18 31.77 16.82 9.34 |
(-) - Reduction in NO production.
Phagocytosis is the process of removing invaded microorganisms from the host blood and other tissue fluids by macrophages28. Immunomodulators are considered to enhance phagocytic activity in vitro. The increased functional ability of macrophages was evident from increased expression of NBT dye reduction. NBT assay with S. alba indicated that ethanol seed extract expressed maximum phagocytic stimulation with 83.08% being the utmost stimuli at 12.5μg/ml. However, stimulation decreased as with higher and lower concentrations. (figure 2 and Table 2). The result observed in the present study was in accord to the NBT assay reported in earlier studies29,30, where various concentrations of plant extracts assayed for phagocytosis, modulated with suppression at high concentration and stimulation at lower concentration. This dual effect of plants on NBT dye reduction suggested concentration dependent activity of the plant extracts.
Figure 2: Effect of S. alba seed extract on phagocytic activity in Raw 264.7 macrophage cells.
Data represent the mean±S.D. of independent experiments performed in triplicates (n=3).
Statistical significance is indicated as determined by one-way ANOVA.
**P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.
Table 2: Percentage of stimulation of phagocytosis in Raw 264.7 cells treated with Sinapis alba seed extracts.
|
S. No. |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Percentage of No production |
|
1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. |
100 50 25 12.5 6.25 3.12 1.56 |
-17.30 1.50 41.72 83.08 72.55 41.72 19.92 |
(-) - Reduction in phagocytosis stimulation.
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry analysis of ethanol solvent extracts of S. alba plant seed led to the identification of different organic compounds. The chemical compositions, peak area percentage, retention time, molecular weight and chemical formula of each seed extracts analyzed and identified through the NIST database were presented in figure 3 and table 3.
Ligands were made out of thirteen compounds present in the ethanol seed extract of S. alba identified using GC-MS analysis and their molecular and physicochemical properties was analyzed using Lipinski's Rule of five. Blood Brain Barrier Penetration (BBB), Human Intestinal Absorption (HIA), Caco2 cell permeability, Plasma Protein Binding (PPB), and Skin Permeability and were the parameters employed to analyze the ADME properties of the prepared ligand. Results of ADME analysis was set forth in the table 4. 3D Ligand structure of the compounds positive for Druglikness and ADME were given in the figure - 4. Sorted out ligands qualified by Lipinski's rule of five and did not show any mutagenicity were docked with target protein 4NKQ.
Figure 3: GC-MS chromatogram of the ethanol extract of Sinapis alba seed.
Table 3: Chemical compositions of ethanol extract of Sinapis alba seed.
|
S. No. |
RT |
Name of the compound |
Peak % |
MW g/mol |
Chemical formula |
|
01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. 12. 13. |
5.6 11.18 13.32 17.03 17.78 18.75 19.52 19.75 20.63 21.25 22.58 23.57 26.48 |
Cyclohexane, 1-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl),(R)- Caryophyllene Decanoic acid, 2,6,8-trimethyl-, methyl ester Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester 10,13-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester 1-Hexadecanone, 1-cyclophentyl- Eicosanoic acid 11-Eicosenoic acid, methyl ester Ethyl 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecenoate 13-Docosenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- Ethyl 13-docosenoate(ethyl erucate) Neronine, 4a,5-dihydro- |
0.30 1.55 0.60 0.44 7.68 2.70 28.66 31.42 0.23 7.16 1.27 17.58 0.35 |
136.23 204.35 228.37 270.45 284.47 294.47 308.54 312.53 324.54 296.53 352.59 352.59 347.36 |
C10H16 C15H24 C14H28O2 C17H34O2 C18H36O2 C19H34O2 C21H40O C20H40O2 C21H40O2 C20H40O C23H44O2 C23H44O2 C18H21NO6 |
*Note: RT- Retention time, MW- Molecular weight
Table 4: Compounds following parameters of Lipinski’s rule and ADME properties.
|
S. No. |
Compounds |
BBB |
HIA |
Caco2 cell permeability |
MD CK |
PPB |
Skin permea bility |
Rule of five |
Toxic ity |
|
1. |
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester |
14.69 |
100 |
56.86 |
66.31 |
100 |
-0.571 |
Suitable |
NM |
|
2. |
Decanoic acid,2,6,8- trimethyl-, methyl ester |
8.04 |
100 |
33.87 |
25.52 |
100 |
-0.762 |
Suitable |
NM |
|
3. |
10,13-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester |
13.72 |
100 |
47.11 |
67.08 |
100 |
-0.539 |
Suitable |
NM |
|
4. |
11-Eicosenoic acid, methyl ester |
17.55 |
100 |
48.32 |
67.86 |
100 |
-0.516 |
Suitable |
NM |
|
5. |
13-Docosenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- |
17.83 |
100 |
49.23 |
67.99 |
100 |
-0.500 |
Suitable |
NM |
|
6. |
Ethyl 13-Docosenoate (ethyl erucate) |
18.13 |
100 |
57.39 |
68.00 |
100 |
-0.498 |
Suitable |
NM |
|
7. |
Ethyl 3,7,11,15 Tetra methyl-2-hexadecenoate |
16.39 |
100 |
55.92 |
65.92 |
100 |
-0.540 |
Suitable |
NM |
|
8. |
1- Hexadecanone, 1- cyclophentyl- |
19.26 |
100 |
57.30 |
65.77 |
100 |
-0.534 |
Suitable |
NM |
Figure 4: Structure of ligands following parameters for Lipinski’s rule and ADME properties.
The docking results provided pertinent information about the binding affinity, binding energy and orientation of ligand-receptor interactions. The docking results are summarized in table 5. Of the 8 compounds tested, 4 compounds were observed to be potent, with significant docking score. Compound Ethyl 13-docosenoate (ethyl erucate) with pubchem ID (5364508) bound with high docking score of 142.43 at the active site 2 with five hydrogen bonds. The ligand docked with relative energy 14.65 of with following amino acids B:THR247:HN-5364508:O2, B:HIS239:HA-5364508:O2, B: HIS239: HD2-5364508: O2, B:THR247:HA-5364508:O2 and 5364508:H69-B:GLU248:OE2 as residue of the interaction. The compound Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester bound with a second high docking score of 128.78 with relative energy of 13.83 at the active site 2 of the target protein forming 2 hydrogen bonds. B:SER267:HN-12366:O1 and B:SER267:HG-12366:O1 formed the amino acid residue for the interaction of this ligand. Ligands made out of the plant secondary metabolites showed stronger binding affinity compared to standard levamisole. Molecular visualization of interaction between ligands with active site amino acid residues in the protein receptor 4NKQ is depicted in figure 5and6. The predicted binding scores were well correlated with the in vitro experimental findings. As it could be judged from the molecular docking analysis that the potential in vitro immunomodulatory efficacy of seed extract of S. alba could be possibly due to the presence of the above compounds.
Figure 5: Molecular interaction of Ligands with MCSFR protein.
Figure 6: Amino acid residues in molecular interaction of Ligands with MCSFR protein
Table 5: Molecular interaction of 4NKQ protein with ligands.
|
S. No. |
Compound Name |
PubChem ID |
Binding site |
Relative energy |
Dock score |
RMSD (Ĺ) |
|
1. |
11-Eicosenoic acid, methyl ester |
5319603 |
2 |
17.75 |
121.36 |
0.000 |
|
2. |
Ethyl 13-docosenoate (ethyl erucate) |
5364508 |
2 |
14.65 |
142.43 |
0.000 |
|
3. |
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester |
12366 |
2 |
13.83 |
128.78 |
0.000 |
|
4. |
1-Hexadecanone, 1- cyclophentyl- |
549696 |
2 |
15.06 |
125.42 |
0.000 |
|
5. |
Levamisole (Standard) |
26879 |
2 |
4.95 |
69.65 |
0.000 |
CONCLUSION:
Immunomodulatory activity in the present study was indicated by the stimulation of production of Nitric Oxide and phagocytosis activity. The study revealed that S. alba was capable to strengthen the immune system. Ethanol seed extract modulate immune responses significantly by enhancing above stated parameters. The in vitro test results were validated using in silico analysis resulted with the similar outcome, concluding that S. alba possess immunomodulatory efficacy. Though activity of the plant molecule can be predicted using molecular docking study, in vivo examination on animal models is essential to confirm the immunomodulatory potential of these compounds.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
The authors are thankful to The Secretary and Principal, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda College, Mylapore, Chennai, India for providing necessary facilities. We specially thank Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility (SAIF), Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, India for carrying out GC-MS studies and validation of the results. The authors also acknowledge National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India for supplying cell lines. We express our special gratitude to Dr. P. Kumarasamy, Professor and Head, Bioinformatics Centre and Aris cell, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University for aiding in silico studies.
REFERENCES:
1. Peter J. Delves, Seamus J. Martin, Dennis R. Burton, Ivan M. Roitt. Roitt's Essential Immunology. John Wiley and Sons. 2017
2. Bin-Hafeez B, Haque R, Parvez S, Pandey S, Sayeed I, Raisuddin S. Immunomodulatory effects of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L.) extract in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2003; 3(2): 257-65.
3. Ogunkunle ATJ, Olopade OR. Studies on the asthma coughs plant Crinum jagus L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Nigeria. Afr J Plant Sci. 2011; 5(2): 108–114.
4. Mandal SC, and Lakshmi SM. Pharmacognosy and phytotherapy research. In: Dwivedi PK, Dwivedi SK, Kalita MC, editors. Biodiversity and Environmental Biotechnology. Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers (India). 2007: 177–224.
5. Walaa, N.A. Immunomodulatory and natural immunomodulators. J. Allergy Inflamm. 2017; 1: e101.
6. Nadkarni KR. Indian Materia Medica. 3rd ed. Mumbai: Bombay Popular Prakashan. 1954
7. Sujatha, Ravishankar, Mariajancyrani, Chandramohan. Preliminary phytochemical investigation and antimicrobial activity of S. alba. Scholars J Appl Med Sci. 2013; 1(3): 138-41.
8. Redfern J, Kinninmonth M, Burdass D and Verran J. Using soxhlet ethanol extraction to produce and test plant material (essential oils) for their antimicrobial properties. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014; 15(1):45-46.
9. Praveen Kumar P, Kumaravel S, Lalitha C. Screening of antioxidant activity, total phenolics and GC-MS study of Vitex negundo. AJBR. 2010; 4: 191-195.
10. Griess, P. Ber. Deutsch Chem. Ges. 1879; 12: 426.
11. Park BH, Fikrig SM and Smithwick EM. Infection and nitroblue-tetrazolium reductions by neutrophils: a diagnostic aid. Lancet. 1968; 292:532.
12. Eswaramoorthy R, Hailekiros H, Kedir F, Endale M. In silico Molecular Docking, DFT Analysis and ADMET Studies of Carbazole Alkaloid and Coumarins from Roots of Clausena anisata: A Potent Inhibitor for Quorum Sensing. Adv Appl Bioinform Chem. 2021; 5(14): 13-24.
13. Rao SN, Head MS, Kulkarni A, Lalonde JM. Validation studies of the site-directed docking program LibDock. J Chem Inf Model. 2007; 47: 2159-71.
14. Jaikumar K, Sheik Noor Mohamed M, John Wyson W, Deventhiran M, Babu A, Anand D, Saravanan P. In silico docking analysis of bioactive compounds from Calophyllum inophyllum L. ethanol leaf extract against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017; 10(8): 214-19.
15. Mazumder PM, Shaktiprasad P, Hitesh P, Dinakar S and Paramaguru R. Evaluation of immunomodulatory activity of Glycyrhiza glabra L. roots in combination with zing. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2012: 15-20.
16. Ding AH, Nathan CF and Stuehr DJ. Release of reactive nitrogen intermediates and reactive oxygen intermediates from mouse peritoneal macrophages. Comparison of activating cytokines and evidence for independent production. J Immunol. 1988; 141: 2407-12.
17. Inngjerdingen KT, Debes SC, Inngjerdingen M, Hokputsa S, Harding SE and Rolstad B. Bioactive pectic polysaccharides from Glinus oppositifolius (L.) Aug. DC., a Malian medicinal plant, isolation and partial characterization. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005; 101: 204-214.
18. Lopes FCM, Calvo TR, Vilegas W and Carlos IZ. Inhibition of hydrogen peroxide, nitric oxide and TNF-a production in peritoneal macrophages by ethyl acetate fraction from Alchornea glandulosa. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005; 28: 1726-1730.
19. Rimbach G, Park YC, Guo Q, Moini H, Qureshi N, Saliou C, Takayama K, Virgili F and Packer L. Nitric oxide synthesis and TNF-α secretion in Raw 264.7 macrophages: mode of action of a fermented papaya preparation. Life Science. 2000; 67: 679-694.
20. Engwerda CR, Andrew D, Murphy M and Mynott TL. Bromelain activates murine macrophages and natural killer cells in vitro. Cell Immunol. 2001; 210: 5-10.
21. Punturee K, Wild CP and Vinitketkumneuna U. Thai medicinal plants modulate nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-α in J774.2 mouse macrophages. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2004; 95: 183-189.
22. Kim IT, Park YM, Shin KM, et al. Antiinflammatory and antinociceptive effects of the extract from Kalopanax pictus, Pueraria thunbergiana and Rhus verniciflua. J Ethnopharmacol, 2004; 94: 165-73.
23. Pacher P, Beckman JS and Liaudet, L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2007; 87: 315-424.
24. Terao J. Dietary flavonoids as antioxidants. Forum Nutr. 2009; 61: 87-94.
25. Lander HM, Jacovina AT, Davis RJ and Tauras JM. Differential activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases by nitric oxide-related species. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 272: 19705-19709.
26. Hendriks JJA, Teunissen CE, de Vries HE and Dijkstra CD. ‘Macrophages and neurodegeneration’, Brain Research Reviews, 2005; 48: 185-195.
27. Wynn TA, Chawla A and Pollard JW. Origins and hallmarks of macrophages: Development, homeostasis, and disease. Nature. 2013; 496(7446): 445-455.
28. Sudhakarn DS, Srirekha P, Devasree LD, Premsingh S and Michael RD. Immunostimulatory effects of Tinospora cordifolia Miers leaf extract in Oreochromis mossambicus. Indian. J. Exp. Biol. 2006; 44: 726-732.
29. Manosroi A, Saraphanchotiwitthaya A and Manosroi J. Effects of Pouteria cambodiana extracts on in vitro immunomodulatory activity of mouse immune system. Fitoterapia. 2006; 77: 189-193.
30. Juvekar AR and Hule AK. In vitro immune effects of Indole-3- carbinol. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2009; 2(7): 1224-1227.
|
Received on 26.10.2024 Revised on 24.02.2025 Accepted on 02.05.2025 Published on 01.12.2025 Available online from December 06, 2025 Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(12):6021-6027. DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00870 © RJPT All right reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|